Key result
Higher VLDL cholesterol linked to ~107% higher MI risk per 1-mmol/l increase.
Why the study?
It is unclear which fraction of myocardial infarction risk from apoB-containing lipoproteins is explained by cholesterol and triglycerides in very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs).
Do VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides explain the risk of myocardial infarction associated with apoB-containing lipoproteins in individuals free of lipid-lowering therapy?
Cohort (n=25,480)
Do VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides explain the risk of myocardial infarction associated with apoB-containing lipoproteins in individuals free of lipid-lowering therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 2.07 (95% CI 1.81–2.36)
VLDL cholesterol, rather than VLDL triglycerides, accounts for half of the myocardial infarction risk associated with apoB-containing lipoproteins, highlighting its primary role in atherogenesis.
Background: Plasma apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a composite measure of all apoB-containing lipoproteins causing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, it is unclear which fraction of risk is explained by cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively, in very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs). Objectives: The authors tested the hypothesis that VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides each explain part of the myocardial infarction risk from apoB-containing lipoproteins. Methods: Nested within 109,751 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study, the authors examined 25,480 subjects free of lipid-lowering therapy and myocardial infarction at study entry. All had measurements of plasma apoB (quantitating number of apoB-containing lipoproteins) and cholesterol and triglyceride content of VLDL, intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDLs), and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs). Results: During a median 11 years of follow-up, 1,816 were diagnosed with myocardial infarction. Per 1-mmol/l higher levels, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for myocardial infarction were 2.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81 to 2.36) for VLDL cholesterol, 1.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.25) for VLDL triglycerides, 5.38 (95% CI: 3.73 to 7.75) for IDL cholesterol, and 1.86 (95% CI: 1.62 to 2.14) for LDL cholesterol. Per 1-g/l higher plasma apoB, the corresponding value was 2.21 (95% CI: 1.90 to 2.58). In a step-up Cox regression, risk factors for myocardial infarction entered by importance as VLDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking, and IDL + LDL cholesterol, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not enter the model. VLDL cholesterol explained 50% and IDL + LDL cholesterol 29% of the risk of myocardial infarction from apoB-containing lipoproteins, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not explain risk. Conclusions: VLDL cholesterol explained one-half of the myocardial infarction risk from elevated apoB-containing lipoproteins, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not explain risk. This study was funded by the Danish Heart Foundation, Denmark grant no.: 18-R124-A8511-22089 and by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Denmark grant no.: NNF18OC0052893. The funders did not participate in the design or conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; and in preparation, review, or approval of the paper. Dr. Varbo is a current employee of Novo Nordisk. Dr. Davey Smith was supported by the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol MC_UU_00011/1. Dr. Nordestgaard has consultancies with AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Regeneron, Akcea, Amgen, Kowa, Denka Seiken, Amarin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Silence Therap. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balling et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction risk (n=25,480). VLDL cholesterol vs. Lower levels was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.81-2.36). Higher VLDL cholesterol levels were associated with increased myocardial infarction risk (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.81-2.36 per 1-mmol/l increase), explaining half the risk from apoB-containing lipoproteins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: