Key result
Early AVR evaluated against active surveillance in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis remains uncertain and controversial despite available diagnostic tools and guideline recommendations.
Does an early aortic valve replacement (AVR) strategy improve outcomes compared to active surveillance in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis?
Meta-Analysis
Does an early aortic valve replacement (AVR) strategy improve outcomes compared to active surveillance in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis?
This review and meta-analysis evaluates the evidence for early aortic valve replacement versus active surveillance in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis to inform optimal management strategies.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular diseases encountered in clinical practice. Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) when the aortic valve is severely stenotic and the patient is symptomatic; however, a substantial proportion of patients with severe AS are asymptomatic at the time of first diagnosis. Although specific morphological valve features, exercise testing, stress imaging, and biomarkers can help to identify patients with asymptomatic severe AS who may benefit from early AVR, the optimal management of these patients remains uncertain and controversial. The current report presents a comprehensive review of the natural history and the diagnostic evaluation of asymptomatic patients with severe AS, and is followed by a meta-analysis from reported studies comparing an early AVR strategy to active surveillance, with an emphasis on the level of evidence substantiating the current guideline recommendations. Finally, perspectives on directions for future investigation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Généreux et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Early aortic valve replacement (AVR) vs. Active surveillance was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: