This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive acute superficial abscesses were randomly allocated to incision, curettage and primary suture without parenteral antibiotics (64 cases) or to conventional treatment with incision, drainage and dressings (73 cases). Wound healing was faster; 7.0 days: 25.1 days (P less than 0.01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test), the number of hospital visits was smaller; 3.8 visits: 11.1 visits (P less than 0.01) and the time off work was shorter; 4.0 days: 14.1 days (P less than 0.01) in the group treated by primary closure compared with those managed conventionally. In this study no complications attributable to the withholding of antibiotics occurred. Incision and primary closure of abscesses is safe and more economic than conventional drainage. Routine antibiotic cover is not necessary.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stewart et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: