Aim To assess efficacy of current management approaches of subcutaneous abscess at the Royal Devon University Healthcare Trust (RD&E). Method Our audit is based on the MAGIC (Management of Acute surGIcal absCesses) national audit which involved anonymous retrospective analysis of patient records at the RD&E during September – December 2022. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and their management. Furthermore, we conducted a literature review to compare our results to the recommended practice. Results 31 patients records were analysed whereby 22 underwent surgical intervention (general anesthetic 17, local anesthetic 5) whereby the most common incision type was transverse (n=7). Nine patients were diabetic, two were immunosuppressed, 29 had hidradenitis suppurativa, while 19 had a past medical history of abscesses (n=31). The most common abscess type was pilonidal sinus (n=10). Eighteen patients received antibiotics prior to hospital admission, 12 of whom underwent surgery. Furthermore, 19 patients received antibiotics upon admission to hospital (n=31). Of the surgically treated cohort, 19 underwent packing and six were discharged with antibiotics. Conclusions Most subcutaneous abscess are approached surgically. However, postoperative care varies widely, with prolonged packing and frequent use of antibiotic postoperatively. Literature reviews have suggested no benefit of postoperative packing and specified certain circumstances of antibiotic use. Furthermore, clear communication with primary care providers detailing clear postoperative instructions is vital for patient safety and cost effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shams et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: