Why the study?
Does NT-proBNP measurement accurately exclude heart failure in primary care patients presenting with dyspnoea?
Does NT-proBNP measurement accurately exclude heart failure in primary care patients presenting with dyspnoea?
NT-proBNP measurement in primary care patients with dyspnoea has a high negative predictive value (97%) for excluding heart failure, potentially reducing the need for echocardiographic screening.
May support sex-specific NT-proBNP cutoffs to exclude HF in older dyspnoeic patients; leaves open prospective validation before primary care adoption.
AIM: Evaluation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to confirm or disprove heart failure in community patients complaining of dyspnoea. METHODS AND RESULTS: General practitioners referred 345 consecutive patients complaining of dyspnoea to our hospital-based clinic, where a diagnosis was established based on a combined programme for heart and lung diseases including echocardiography. The level of NT-proBNP in plasma was also measured. The mean (S.D.) concentration of NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure was significantly higher, 189 (270) pmol/l in patients with heart failure (n=81), than in patients with non-cardiac dyspnoea (n=264), 17 (38) pmol/l (P<0.001). In patients > or = 50 years NT-proBNP <11 pmol/l for men and <17 pmol/l for women excluded heart failure with a negative predictive value of 97% while the positive predictive value was 53%, the sensitivity 95% and the specificity 68%. Areas under receiver operator characteristic curves for men and women were 0.93 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a relevant setting of primary care patients complaining of dyspnoea, NT-proBNP seems promising for disproval of heart failure, and this test may reduce the need for echocardiographic screening with 50%. However, the discrimination levels of NT-proBNP found in this study may need prospective confirmation, before the test can be generally recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: