• Accent-based in-group preferences emerge by age 3. • Preferences increase non-linearly across development, with sharp growth between ages 4.5 and 5.5. • Exposure to other languages reduces children’s accent-based preferences. • Girls show stronger accent-based biases than boys. Children tend to favor in-group members over out-group members, but how do these preferences develop across childhood, and what role does intergroup contact (exposure and/or contact with out-group members) play? Here, we focus on the developmental trajectory of accent-based preferences, and whether exposure to other languages and accents reduces these biases. In two experiments, children completed a friendship preference task, where they were asked to choose who they preferred as a friend between locally accented English speakers (in-group) and foreign-accented English speakers (out-group). In Experiment 1 ( N = 194), which tested 4-year-old children (ages 3.75–5.20 years) with at least 70% exposure to English, we found a preference for in-group speakers that increased with age, as well as an effect of English (but not accent) exposure, with children exposed to multiple languages showing weaker preferences. In Experiment 2 ( N = 483), which included a broader age range (3.5–7 years) and greater variability in English exposure (≥50%), we found a nonlinear effect of age, with preferences for local speakers emerging by age 3 and increasing most sharply around ages 4–5. Across the full sample, English exposure did not predict preferences, but in children with ≥70% English exposure, greater exposure was associated with stronger in-group preferences, replicating Experiment 1. Unexpectedly, we also found an effect of gender, with girls exhibiting stronger biases than boys. These findings indicate that accent-based biases emerge early and increase non-linearly with age, are stronger in girls, and that exposure to multiple languages may reduce these biases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: