Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unified master proof dossier for the TEBAC Birch–Swinnerton–Dyer program on elliptic curves, indicating clear proof structures.
This record contains the unified master proof dossier for the TEBAC Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer program for elliptic curves over \( Q\). The manuscript integrates the five-module chain\[{BSD-I}{BSD-II}{BSD-III}{BSD-IV}{BSD-V}\]into a single continuously organized master document. BSD-I fixes the centered operator and parity package at the arithmetic center \(s=1\). BSD-II supplies the determinant, parity/reference-factor, and completed comparison framework, including the centered determinant in the variable\[σ=(s-1)^2\]and the completed comparison object used to read the central order of the completed elliptic \(L\)-function. BSD-III extracts the analytic-rank identity by identifying the order of vanishing at the center with the central spectral multiplicity. BSD-IV is the arithmetic bridge module: it constructs the Selmer/cohomological interface, the spectral realization map, the Mordell--Weil bridge, and the height/regulator comparison. BSD-V performs the terminal assembly, transferring the completed leading-term identity to the classical Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer formula. The proof architecture is designed to keep determinant comparison, analytic rank, arithmetic rank, height/regulator comparison, residual Selmer/Sha routing, and final leading-term assembly in separate theorem homes. The master dossier records the full TEBAC proof chain, the module interfaces, the non-circularity discipline, and the final assembly route toward the classical Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer rank statement and leading-term formula. This version is a full-source verification package intended for external mathematical review. It presents the completed internal TEBAC BSD proof dossier while preserving the distinction between internal module closure and independent referee-level validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: