Preprint presents a master proof spine for the TEBAC Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer program, outlining key results in elliptic curves over Q, indicating future verification needs.
This preprint presents a journal-facing master proof spine for the TEBAC Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer program for elliptic curves over \( Q\). The manuscript compresses the longer modular proof dossier into a shorter theorem-oriented structure organized around the chain\[{BSD-I}{BSD-II}{BSD-III}{BSD-IV}{BSD-V}.\] BSD-I fixes the centered operator and parity package at the arithmetic center \(s=1\), with centered variables\[ν=s-1, σ=(s-1)^2.\]BSD-II supplies the determinant, parity/reference-factor, and completed comparison package through the \(OC1--OC4\) route: corrected centered heat trace, Mellin/zeta regularization, centered determinant, normalized reference factor, completed comparison quotient, and no-spurious-center control. BSD-III extracts the analytic-rank identity\[ordₛ₌₁L(E,s)=(DBSD-1).\]BSD-IV is the arithmetic bridge layer, organized around the \(H1--H5\) gates: restricted Poitou--Tate detector saturation, support-boundary reciprocity cancellation, terminal exactness, generator-complete Mordell--Weil realization, and raw local Néron-symbol height normalization. BSD-V performs the terminal completed-to-classical leading-term assembly. The manuscript is intended as a compact journal-style proof spine. The longer 1228-page master dossier is cited as a verification archive containing the expanded module-level derivations, proof ledgers, and non-circularity checks. This journal version should be read together with that dossier for full source-level verification. Status statement: the current proof spine records the TEBAC modular route toward the Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer rank statement and leading-term formula. The remaining critical verification boundary for a fully unconditional external proof is the theorem-level closure of the BSD-IV arithmetic bridge, especially the \(H1--H5\) hard gates, primitive spectral-to-Kummer bridge, and raw Néron--Tate height comparison, without importing the final BSD formula, pre-assumed rank equality, \((E)=0\), or downstream BSD-V assembly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: