PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2009Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering155 citations

Fluid–structure interaction analysis of a patient‐specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms

View Full Paper
RTRyo ToriiNWNigel B. WoodNHNearchos Hadjiloizou

Structured PICO

P
Population
3-D model of a stenosed human right coronary artery reconstructed from multislice CT images of a patient with severe stenosis
I
Intervention
Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis with arterial wall modeled as a Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material
C
Comparator
Rigid-wall computational model
O
Outcome
Wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI)surrogate

Fluid-structure interaction modeling shows that while instantaneous wall shear stress is affected by arterial compliance, time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index are not significantly different from rigid-wall models in a stenosed right coronary artery.

Abstract

Abstract Coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of the human right coronary artery (RCA) has been carried out to investigate the effects of wall compliance on coronary hemodynamics. A 3‐D model of a stenosed RCA was reconstructed based on multislice computerized tomography images. A velocity waveform in the proximal RCA and a pressure waveform in the distal RCA of a patient with a severe stenosis were acquired with a catheter delivered wire probe and applied as boundary conditions. The arterial wall was modeled as a Mooney–Rivlin hyperelastic material. The predicted maximum wall displacement (3.85 mm) was comparable with the vessel diameter (∼4 mm), but the diameter variation was much smaller, 0.134 mm at the stenosis and 0.486 mm in the distal region. Comparison of the computational results between the FSI and rigid‐wall models showed that the instantaneous wall shear stress (WSS) distributions were affected by diameter variation in the arterial wall; increasing systolic blood pressure dilated the vessel and consequently lowered WSS, whereas the opposite occurred when pressure started to decrease. However, the effects of wall compliance on time‐averaged WSS (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were insignificant (4.5 and 2.7% difference in maximum TAWSS and OSI, respectively). Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Torii et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01f940a7a051e0e4d8b1aehttps://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1231
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper