Why the study?
Drug development in HFpEF has been hampered by a lack of consensus on pre-clinical model standards, prompting evaluation of mouse models against recent clinical diagnostic algorithms.
Current pre-clinical mouse models of HFpEF largely fail to meet clinical diagnostic criteria, highlighting the need for novel multifactorial models to improve translational research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urges caution extrapolating pre-clinical HFpEF findings to patients; leaves open development of multifactorial models meeting clinical criteria.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multifactorial disease accounting for a large and increasing proportion of all clinical HF presentations. As a clinical syndrome, HFpEF is characterized by typical signs and symptoms of HF, a distinct cardiac phenotype and raised natriuretic peptides. Non-cardiac comorbidities frequently co-exist and contribute to the pathophysiology of HFpEF. To date, no therapy has proven to improve outcomes in HFpEF, with drug development hampered, at least partly, by lack of consensus on appropriate standards for pre-clinical HFpEF models. Recently, two clinical algorithms (HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores) have been developed to improve and standardize the diagnosis of HFpEF. In this review, we evaluate the translational utility of HFpEF mouse models in the context of these HFpEF scores. We systematically recorded evidence of symptoms and signs of HF or clinical HFpEF features and included several cardiac and extra-cardiac parameters as well as age and sex for each HFpEF mouse model. We found that most of the pre-clinical HFpEF models do not meet the HFpEF clinical criteria, although some multifactorial models resemble human HFpEF to a reasonable extent. We therefore conclude that to optimize the translational value of mouse models to human HFpEF, a novel approach for the development of pre-clinical HFpEF models is needed, taking into account the complex HFpEF pathophysiology in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Withaar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: