Why the study?
Rescuers were observed to consistently hyperventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR. This study aimed to quantify the degree of excessive ventilation in humans and determine whether comparable ventilation rates during CPR in animals decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival.
Does excessive ventilation rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival compared to standard ventilation rates in cardiac arrest?
Observational (n=13)
Random order crossover for hemodynamic pig study (9 pigs)
Does excessive ventilation rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival compared to standard ventilation rates in cardiac arrest?
Professional rescuers frequently hyperventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR, which in porcine models significantly increases intrathoracic pressure and reduces both coronary perfusion pressure and survival.
Hyperventilation during CPR may impair survival; leaves open optimal rates for human resuscitation pending controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: A clinical observational study revealed that rescuers consistently hyperventilated patients during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of excessive ventilation in humans and determine if comparable excessive ventilation rates during CPR in animals significantly decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: In humans, ventilation rate and duration during CPR was electronically recorded by professional rescuers. In 13 consecutive adults (average age, 63+/-5.8 years) receiving CPR (7 men), average ventilation rate was 30+/-3.2 per minute (range, 15 to 49). Average duration per breath was 1.0+/-0.07 per second. No patient survived. Hemodynamics were studied in 9 pigs in cardiac arrest ventilated in random order with 12, 20, or 30 breaths per minute. Survival rates were then studied in 3 groups of 7 pigs in cardiac arrest that were ventilated at 12 breaths per minute (100% O2), 30 breaths per minute (100% O2), or 30 breaths per minute (5% CO2/95% O2). In animals treated with 12, 20, and 30 breaths per minute, the mean intrathoracic pressure (mm Hg/min) and coronary perfusion pressure (mm Hg) were 7.1+/-0.7, 11.6+/-0.7, 17.5+/-1.0 (P<0.0001), and 23.4+/-1.0, 19.5+/-1.8, and 16.9+/-1.8 (P=0.03), respectively. Survival rates were 6/7, 1/7, and 1/7 with 12, 30, and 30+ CO2 breaths per minute, respectively (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Professional rescuers were observed to excessively ventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR. Subsequent animal studies demonstrated that similar excessive ventilation rates resulted in significantly increased intrathoracic pressure and markedly decreased coronary perfusion pressures and survival rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aufderheide et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (n=13). Excessive ventilation (hyperventilation, ~30 breaths/min) during CPR vs. Standard ventilation (12 breaths/min in animal model) was evaluated on Survival and coronary perfusion pressure (in animal model); ventilation rate and survival (in humans) (p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: