In a high-risk patient-specific in-vitro model, VIV-TAVI across various implantation depths and alignments did not significantly impair left or right coronary flows.
Does VIV-TAVI with CoreValve-Evolut-23 inside a Trifecta-19 impair coronary perfusion in a high-risk patient-specific 3D-printed model?
In a high-risk patient-specific in vitro model, VIV-TAVI did not significantly impair coronary flow, suggesting a need to refine coronary obstruction risk stratification to optimize preventive interventions.
Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) carries a high mortality risk. This in-vitro study assessed coronary perfusion in a high-risk VIV-TAVI scenario. A patient deemed at high-risk and treated with preventive Chimney stenting was selected as case study. A 3D-printed aortic root model was fabricated from pre-operative imaging and used to replicate the patient's VIV-TAVI setting. A CoreValve-Evolut-23 was implanted within a Trifecta-19 at five depths, with commissural alignment and 60° misalignment, to explore procedural variability and associated risk margins. The model was tested in a pulsatile mock loop with a coronary perfusion simulator. Flow and pressure were recorded pre- and post-VIV-TAVI under physiological conditions. Across all tested configurations, VIV-TAVI didn't significantly impair left or right coronary flows. The recommended depth optimized hemodynamic valve performance. Findings suggest refining coronary obstruction risk stratification in VIV-TAVI to improve decision-making regarding preventive interventions.
Perico et al. (2026) studied High-risk transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) (n=1). VIV-TAVI (CoreValve-Evolut-23 within a Trifecta-19) vs. Pre-VIV-TAVI baseline was evaluated on Coronary perfusion (flow and pressure). In a high-risk patient-specific in-vitro model, VIV-TAVI across various implantation depths and alignments did not significantly impair left or right coronary flows.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: