PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research0 citations

In Vitro Assessment of Coronary Perfusion after Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a High-Risk Patient-Specific Experimental Model

View Full Paper
FPFrancesca PericoPolitecnico di MilanoCRClaudia RomagnoniASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoFPFabio PappalardoPolitecnico di Milano

Key Result

In a high-risk patient-specific in-vitro model, VIV-TAVI across various implantation depths and alignments did not significantly impair left or right coronary flows.

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the impact of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation on coronary perfusion in a high-risk scenario.
  • In-vitro study using a patient-specific experimental model with a 3D-printed aortic root.
  • A CoreValve-Evolut-23 was implanted within a Trifecta-19 under various alignments and depths.
  • Flow and pressure measurements were taken in a pulsatile mock loop before and after VIV-TAVI.
  • Coronary flows for both left and right arteries were not significantly impaired post-VIV-TAVI.
  • The optimal depth of implantation improved hemodynamic performance of the valve.
  • Findings indicate the need for refined risk stratification strategies in VIV-TAVI procedures.

Structured PICO

Does VIV-TAVI with CoreValve-Evolut-23 inside a Trifecta-19 impair coronary perfusion in a high-risk patient-specific 3D-printed model?

P
Population
3D-printed aortic root model fabricated from pre-operative imaging of a patient deemed at high-risk for coronary obstruction during VIV-TAVI
I
Intervention
CoreValve-Evolut-23 implanted within a Trifecta-19 at five depths, with commissural alignment and 60° misalignment
C
Comparator
Pre-VIV-TAVI baseline flow and pressure
O
Outcome
Coronary perfusion (flow and pressure) under physiological conditionssurrogate

In a high-risk patient-specific in vitro model, VIV-TAVI did not significantly impair coronary flow, suggesting a need to refine coronary obstruction risk stratification to optimize preventive interventions.

Abstract

Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) carries a high mortality risk. This in-vitro study assessed coronary perfusion in a high-risk VIV-TAVI scenario. A patient deemed at high-risk and treated with preventive Chimney stenting was selected as case study. A 3D-printed aortic root model was fabricated from pre-operative imaging and used to replicate the patient's VIV-TAVI setting. A CoreValve-Evolut-23 was implanted within a Trifecta-19 at five depths, with commissural alignment and 60° misalignment, to explore procedural variability and associated risk margins. The model was tested in a pulsatile mock loop with a coronary perfusion simulator. Flow and pressure were recorded pre- and post-VIV-TAVI under physiological conditions. Across all tested configurations, VIV-TAVI didn't significantly impair left or right coronary flows. The recommended depth optimized hemodynamic valve performance. Findings suggest refining coronary obstruction risk stratification in VIV-TAVI to improve decision-making regarding preventive interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perico et al. (2026) studied High-risk transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) (n=1). VIV-TAVI (CoreValve-Evolut-23 within a Trifecta-19) vs. Pre-VIV-TAVI baseline was evaluated on Coronary perfusion (flow and pressure). In a high-risk patient-specific in-vitro model, VIV-TAVI across various implantation depths and alignments did not significantly impair left or right coronary flows.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025a639cddff7633412bcdhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-025-10726-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patient-Specific Multiscale Modeling of Blood Flow for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery2012 · 243 citations
  2. 22020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines2020 · 2,450 citations
  3. 3Valve-in-Valve Hemodynamics of 20-mm Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Small Bioprostheses2011 · 27 citations
  4. 4Implantation Depth and Rotational Orientation Effect on Valve-in-Valve Hemodynamics and Sinus Flow2018 · 67 citations
  5. 5Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures: Challenges and Future Directions2024 · 6 citations