Key result
Genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing proves cost-effective versus standard care at ~$437 per QALY.
Why the study?
In Chile, acenocoumarol is the standard anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation, but its dosing has substantial interindividual variability due to CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms.
Does genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing improve cost-effectiveness compared to standard care in Chilean patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing improve cost-effectiveness compared to standard care in Chilean patients with atrial fibrillation?
Genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing is a highly cost-effective strategy compared to standard care for anticoagulation in Chilean patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cost-effective genotype-guided acenocoumarol use in Chilean AF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Chile and worldwide, representing a major public health challenge that demands urgent preventive and therapeutic strategies. In atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation is essential, and in Chile acenocoumarol rather than warfarin, used in most countries, is the standard agent. Its dosing shows substantial interindividual variability due to CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms. We developed a cohort-based Markov model to compare standard care, genotype-guided dosing, and genotype-guided dosing adjusted for population-level adherence in 123 Chilean patients with atrial fibrillation and 123 matched simulated individuals. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct medical costs, with cost-effectiveness assessed at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$17,093, estimated using the international approach of approximating the country's GDP per capita rather than a Chilean policy-based value. Genotype-guided dosing achieved the highest effectiveness (2938.34 QALYs) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$436.86/QALY versus standard care, remaining cost-effective in sensitivity analyses up to test prices far exceeding the current US$190. The adherence-adjusted strategy was weakly dominated. These results strongly support implementing pharmacogenetic testing for acenocoumarol dosing to optimize anticoagulation safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness in Chile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mena et al. (2026) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=246). Genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing vs. Standard care and adherence-adjusted genotype-guided dosing was evaluated on Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct medical costs (ICER US$436.86/QALY). Genotype-guided acenocoumarol dosing was cost-effective compared to standard care, achieving 2938.34 QALYs with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$436.86/QALY.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: