Why the study?
New anticancer therapies with potential cardiovascular side effects are continuously introduced with unexpected toxicities appearing after clinical introduction, highlighting a crucial need for appropriate preclinical models to understand the biological basis of their cardiotoxicity.
This ESC scientific statement provides a comprehensive overview of preclinical models for studying cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction and offers recommendations to improve the drug development process in cardio-oncology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Our scientific statement, 'Update on Preclinical Models of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: Challenges and Perspectives,' is finally published! Check out this latest paper from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the ESC Council of Cardio Oncology and the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart here. Thanks to all collaborators for their excellent contributions!”
May inform safer cardio-oncology drug development; extends translational framework bridging preclinical models and clinical practice.
New anticancer therapies with potential cardiovascular side effects are continuously being introduced into clinical practice, with new and often unexpected toxicities becoming apparent only after clinical introduction. These unknown toxicities should be identified and understood beforehand to better prepare patients and physicians, enabling the implementation of effective treatments. Therefore, there is a crucial need for appropriate preclinical models to understand the biological basis of their cardiotoxicity. This scientific statement summarizes the preclinical models hitherto used, from in vitro two- and three-dimensional human systems to small and large animals, to pinpoint the molecular mechanisms behind the cardiotoxicity of new-generation anticancer therapies, particularly immunotherapies, and to develop potential cardioprotective strategies. Furthermore, it discusses how preclinical models have contributed to the provocative concept of heart failure being potentially tumorigenic and how the discovery of drugs with both anticancer and cardioprotective actions has revealed a common mechanistic basis for heart failure and cancer. Finally, it discusses the existing gaps between preclinical models and clinical observations in patients, how these discrepancies affect regulatory pathways and the drug development process in cardio-oncology and provides recommendations for closing these gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghigo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: