Laboratory comparative study reveals significant error rates when using nutrient agar instead of standard Mueller-Hinton medium, highlighting the need to strictly follow susceptibility guidelines.
BACKGROUND: The selection of an appropriate antimicrobial is a challenging task for clinicians. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method is one of the most widely practiced antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST). It is affected by many factors among which are the media used. Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) is the standard medium recommended in guidelines. However, these guidelines are not strictly adhered to in some developing countries. OBJECTIVES: Validation of AST results on nutrient agar (NA) medium used as a substitute for MHA by some microbiology laboratories in Alexandria, Egypt. METHODS: ) ATCC®27853 were comparatively challenged to antibiotics employing MHA and NA. RESULTS: (0%, 0.4%, and 3.2% respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Using NA in AST resulted in multiple errors and the high discrepancy in results compared to MHA making it unreliable for susceptibility testing. MHA should not be replaced by NA in AST. Following guidelines and QC measures for AST must be neither bypassed nor underestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nassar et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: