Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a method to study the interlayer interaction of 2D heterostructures by analyzing the rotational statistics of the as-grown twist angles, as well as in situ manipulation of their relative twist angles using an electron beam. We investigated this in a family of 2D heterostructures: 1–2 layers of Bi 2 Se 3 grown on different monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), i.e. MoS 2 , MoSe 2 , WS 2 , and an alloy MoSe 2(1− x ) S 2 x , which enabled us to compare the relative coupling strengths at junctions with not only similar and dissimilar ‘nearest-layer’ chalcogens, but also with ‘next-nearest-layer’ transition metals, as well as ‘nearest-mixed-layer’ chalcogens. We found that while higher e-beam current densities tend to ‘disrupt’, and lower values ‘recrystallize’ the crystal structure, TMD-specific intermediate-value-ranges can dynamically twist the layers with respect to each other. From their initial as-grown twist angle, as well as the ease with which they can be perturbed to twist in response to various electron beam current densities, we infer that Bi 2 Se 3 /MoSe 2 layers have the strongest interlayer strength, followed by Bi 2 Se 3 /MoS 2 , Bi 2 Se 3 /WS 2 , and Bi 2 Se 3 /MoSe 2(1− x ) S 2 x . Finally, the recipe can be tuned to induce the Bi 2 Se 3 to form nanoparticles that emit a broad photoluminescence and alter the 2D heterostructure’s perceived color. Our results reveal that interlayer interactions play a substantial role even in heterostructures of chemically and crystallographically dissimilar 2D materials, where they are traditionally expected to be ‘weak’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennighausen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: