Why the study?
BAVD was an exclusion criterion in RCTs comparing TAVR to SAVR, and available observational data for TAVR in this population are limited by selection bias with no RCTs yet performed.
This review provides a comprehensive roadmap for future clinical research, including RCTs and registries, to address the evidence gap for TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence gaps limit TAVR in BAVD; leaves open dedicated RCTs and registries to guide future use.
Bicuspid aortic valve disease (BAVD) is present in up to half of all patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) yet was an exclusion criterion for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to SAVR. Nonetheless, approximately 10% of patients currently treated with TAVR have BAVD and available observational data for performing TAVR in these patients are limited by selection bias. Many in the cardiovascular community have advocated for RCTs in this population, but none have been performed. The Heart Valve Collaboratory (HVC) is a multidisciplinary community of stakeholders with the aim of creating significant advances in valvular heart disease by stimulating clinical research, engaging in educational activities, and advancing regulatory science. In December 2020, the HVC hosted a Global Multidisciplinary workshop involving over 100 international experts in the field. Following this 2-day symposium, working groups with varied expertise were convened to discuss BAVD, including the need for and design of RCTs. This review, conducted under the auspices of the HVC, summarizes available data and knowledge gaps regarding procedural therapy for BAVD, outlining specific challenges for trials in this population. We also propose several potential studies that could be performed and discuss respective strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, we present a roadmap for future directions in clinical research in TAVR for BAVD with an emphasis both on RCTs and also prospective registries focused on disease phenotyping to develop parameters and risk scores that could ultimately be applied to patients to inform clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: