Why the study?
Psychometric properties of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale had been tested in American, Italian, and Japanese samples, but not in a Middle Eastern population.
Is the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptoms in a Middle Eastern heart failure population?
Is the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptoms in a Middle Eastern heart failure population?
The Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing heart failure symptoms in a Middle Eastern population.
Supports HFSPS validity for symptom assessment in Middle Eastern HF; extends prior validation but leaves open longitudinal testing in broader cohorts.
BACKGROUND: The Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS) is an 18-item instrument used to assess how bothersome are common signs and symptoms of heart failure (HF). To date, the psychometric properties of the HFSPS have been tested in American, Italian, and Japanese samples. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the HFSPS in a population of Lebanese patients living with HF. METHODS: A rigorous translation and back-translation process was performed. Cultural appropriateness ratings were assessed by an expert panel. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to confirm construct validity, whereas an independent t test using the Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire's scores was conducted to confirm convergent validity. Pearson correlation was performed to confirm discriminant validity using the Self-Care in HF Index Management subscale, whereas predictive validity was evaluated using the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach α . RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (mean age, 63.66 ± 10.55 years; 69.7% male) were included. A series of exploratory factor analyses was conducted and resulted in a 4-factor model. Cronbach α was 0.869. Convergent (high correlation with total Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire; r = 0.762, P < .0001), discriminant (no correlation with self-care management; r = 0.180, P = .078), and predictive (significant correlation with the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised; r = -0.523, P < .0001) validity was supported. CONCLUSION: The reliability and validity of the HFSPS were supportive in this Middle Eastern sample. The HFSPS can be used to assess how bothersome HF symptoms are to improve their management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massouh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: