Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2010Archives of Ophthalmology

Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Ocular Surface Disease Index

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KMKimberly Litwin MillerCalifornia Institute of Technology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kimberly Litwin Miller (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a035dd267f6ea5cc8759cdehttps://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.356
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes2006 · 490 citations
  2. 2Reliability and Validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index2000 · 3,092 citations
  3. 3Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease2009 · 593 citations
  4. 4Clinically important change in quality of life in epilepsy2002 · 187 citations