Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 16, 2004Circulation

C-Reactive Protein Modulates Risk Prediction Based on the Framingham Score

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does adding C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to the Framingham Risk Score improve risk prediction for coronary events in middle-aged men from the general population?

Population

3,435 white men of German nationality, aged 45 to 74 years, drawn from the general population in the…

Comparison

C-reactive protein measurement combined with the… vs Framingham Risk Score (FRS) alone

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

average 6.6 years

Authors

Wolfgang KöenigWolfgang KöenigGeneral / Preventive / LipidsHLHannelore LöwelPreventive CardiologyJBJens BaumertRobert Koch Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May refine stratification in intermediate-risk men; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how C-reactive protein measurements can improve coronary heart disease risk predictions based on the Framingham Risk Score.
  • Measured C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk factors in 3435 white men aged 45 to 74 from the Augsburg area.
  • Calculated the Framingham Risk Score for all participants at baseline.
  • Conducted a Cox regression analysis to assess the contribution of CRP to coronary event risk over an average follow-up of 6.6 years.
  • 191 coronary events occurred during follow-up, with CRP showing a significant contribution to coronary event risk prediction (P=0.0002).
  • CRP added prognostic information to the Framingham Risk Score in two intermediate risk categories (P=0.03 and P=0.02).
  • Findings suggest CRP enhances risk assessment in global coronary heart disease evaluations, particularly for intermediate risk groups.

Structured PICO

Does adding C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to the Framingham Risk Score improve risk prediction for coronary events in middle-aged men from the general population?

P
Population
3,435 white men of German nationality, aged 45 to 74 years, drawn from the general population in the Augsburg area located in Southern Germany.
I
Intervention
C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement combined with the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
C
Comparator
Framingham Risk Score (FRS) alone
O
Outcome
Composite of nonfatal and fatal coronary events, including sudden cardiac deathcomposite

Adding C-reactive protein measurement to the Framingham Risk Score enhances coronary risk prediction, particularly for men in intermediate risk categories.

Cite This Study

Köenig et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03617264b0e44ce79bd1bchttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000120707.98922.e3
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)2001 · 26,208 citations
  2. 2Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and the Calculated Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score2003 · 268 citations
  3. 3Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach1988 · 23,113 citations
  4. 4Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.1989 · 2,245 citations
  5. 5Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in the Prediction of First Cardiovascular Events2002 · 3,625 citations