Highlights the critical lack of specific evidence for treating heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease and the need for tailored research rather than extrapolating from acquired heart failure trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Avoid extrapolating acquired HF therapies to adults with congenital heart disease; leaves open the need for dedicated trials.
Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death in adults with repaired congenital heart disease (CHD). However there is currently little evidence to guide treatment strategies in this growing group of patients. Unlike the majority of HF, which is usually caused by LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction, CHD-HF is more often a consequence of RV disease, valve dysfunction, shunting or pulmonary hypertension. It is therefore not appropriate to extrapolate from the acquired HF literature and apply it to this heterogeneous population of CHD patients. Additionally, patients with CHD have been excluded from most large trials of medical or device therapy of HF, which has resulted in small retrospective and underpowered studies in the CHD population. This article critically reviews the current knowledge about CHD-HF, paying particular attention to medical therapy in different CHD populations, cardiac resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardiac defibrillators, and the challenges of heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support in CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krieger et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: