Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review shows nurse-led CRRT management reduces mortality and enhances treatment in critically ill patients, suggesting better workforce models are needed in LMICs.
Introduction. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a cornerstone treatment for hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Despite technological advances, CRRT outcomes remain variable, and the impact of nursing leadership in CRRT delivery has not been sufficiently synthesized. This study aims to evaluate the effect of nurse-led CRRT management on clinical and treatment-related outcomes in adult critically ill patients.Methods. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies involving adult ICU patients receiving CRRT where nurse-led management was explicitly described. Primary outcomes included mortality, circuit lifespan, and unplanned circuit interruption or clotting. Secondary outcomes included delivered CRRT dose, treatment downtime, and CRRT-related complications.Results. Fifteen eligible studies were identified, including randomized and non-randomized designs evaluating nurse-led CRRT models compared with standard or physician-led care. Nurse-led CRRT management was associated with prolonged circuit lifespan and reduced unplanned interruptions in most studies. Mortality effects were variable. Heterogeneity across studies reflected differences in staffing models, protocols, and outcome definitions.Conclusions. Nurse-led CRRT management appears to improve key treatment-related outcomes and care continuity in adult ICU patients. These findings have important implications for workforce development and care models, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalili et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: