Numerical investigation with finite element modelling shows a pendulum TMD reduces peak acceleration in top-heavy industrial towers, indicating effective seismic response mitigation.
Top-heavy industrial towers, which carry large, concentrated masses of equipment at upper levels and feature open lower stories, are vertically irregular by design and tend to amplify seismic displacement and acceleration demands near the tower top. Although tuned mass dampers (TMDs) have been studied extensively for buildings, bridges and chimneys, their application to this particular class of slender industrial towers—where production-equipment vibration tolerance, retrofit accessibility and limited downtime drive the design—has received little dedicated attention. This paper reports a focused numerical investigation of seismic response mitigation for a 101.2 m molten-asphalt granulation tower retrofitted with a single pendulum-type TMD. A three-dimensional coupled finite element (FE) model was constructed in ABAQUS using C3D8R solid elements for the reinforced-concrete shaft and T3D2 truss elements for the embedded reinforcement; modal analysis returned a fundamental frequency of 0.912 Hz and a torsional-to-translational period ratio of 0.65, indicating a translational-mode-dominated response. Elastic time-history analyses under the El Centro and Taft records together with a code-spectrum-compatible synthetic accelerogram show that a pendulum TMD with mass ratio μ = 2.5%, tuning frequency offset Δf = 5% and damping ratio ξ = 10%—installed at the uppermost equipment level guided by the modal-displacement criterion—reduces the peak top displacement, peak top acceleration and peak base shear by roughly 23%, 23% and 22%, respectively, in both principal directions. The controlled top acceleration falls comfortably below the 2.94 m/s2 operational tolerance of the on-tower melting equipment. To address the rationality of the chosen TMD parameters, a single-variable parametric sensitivity study spanning μ ∈ [1%, 5%], ξ ∈ [5%, 15%] and Δf ∈ [0%, 10%] is performed on an equivalent reduced model that captures the qualitative parameter-response trends; the chosen baseline values lie inside a stable performance plateau and are shown to be a balanced compromise among the three response measures. The principal contribution of the work is, therefore, (i) a complete TMD retrofit framework—modal-based placement, parameter design, coupled FE assembly and multi-record verification—adapted to top-heavy industrial towers, and (ii) qualitative evidence, supported by a sensitivity scan, with a robust proposed parameter set for small-to-moderate detuning. The study is restricted to elastic time-history analyses under frequent-earthquake-level excitation, three ground-motion records and a fixed-base assumption; nonlinear response, larger record sets and soil–structure interaction effects are explicitly identified as scope limitations and are left for follow-up work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: