Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental testing and numerical analysis reveal that steel thickness improves axial capacity in DCPEC columns, suggesting efficient engineering applications.
To investigate the axial compressive behavior of double C-section partially encased composite (DCPEC) columns, 10 DCPEC specimens and two back-to-back bare steel C-section specimens were designed and tested under axial compression. The effects of key parameters, including steel wall thickness, member slenderness ratio, connection type of the built-up double C-sections and connection density, on the failure mode, load–displacement response and ultimate load-carrying capacity were examined. The test results showed that, under otherwise identical conditions, the ultimate load of the bolted stub column was 8.4% higher than that of the welded stub column. When the steel wall thickness increased from 2.0 mm to 3.0 mm, the ultimate load increased by approximately 16%. In contrast, when the slenderness ratio increased from 25.98 to 41.57, the ultimate load decreased by approximately 30%. A finite element model was then established in ABAQUS and validated against the experimental results. The numerical analysis further confirmed that increasing the slenderness ratio reduced the axial load-carrying capacity, whereas increasing the steel wall thickness improved the resistance of the member. The results indicate that the proposed DCPEC column can effectively develop the composite action between cold-formed thin-walled steel and lightweight aggregate concrete, thereby improving axial resistance and showing promising potential for engineering applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: