Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights adaptive sampling impacts on sequencing outcomes in genomic workflows, suggesting performance is condition-dependent.
Real-time selective sequencing on nanopore platforms offers a programmable way to enrich target molecules and deplete background DNA during a run. This approach, widely known as adaptive sampling (AS), has been applied across host depletion, metagenomics, targeted loci, plasmid/AMR workflows, and RNA/transcriptomic protocols, but reported performance varies substantially across studies. This review synthesizes current algorithmic and empirical evidence with emphasis on sequencing-relevant outcomes, including absolute informative yield, target-coverage behavior, throughput effects, and run-to-run stability. Across use cases, relative enrichment is frequently observed, but gains in usable genomic output are strongly conditioned by fragment-length distributions, reference quality, decision-loop latency, and rejection-associated penalties in total yield and pore longevity. Evidence from targeted-panel and complex-locus studies further indicates that improved depth concentration can coexist with coverage non-uniformity and context-specific trade-offs relative to wet-lab enrichment. Overall, the literature supports AS as a valuable but condition-dependent strategy whose benefit is greatest when assay design, reference selection, and computational constraints are jointly optimized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: