We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“With the addition of this antiplatelet drug, the curves start to diverge early, and they continue to separate out over time, further supporting the notion of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor in these individuals. The benefit of ticagrelor was consistent for both the fatal and nonfatal components of the primary endpoint. It was consistent over the duration of treatment and amongst the major clinical subgroups.”
“This analysis pointed to important patterns with regards to common adverse events associated with ticagrelor in the context of clinical benefit. Physicians must consider the overall risks, including higher rates of bleeding and dyspnea particularly within the first year. For patients at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events in the long-term, ticagrelor can provide an important benefit.”
“Now that we have the evidence, when faced with a patient who has had a heart attack, based on these data, I would continue treatment with ticagrelor as long as the patient tolerated it.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonaca et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: