Compares infrared and electro-optical methods for pedestrian detection in fog, implying better safety for autonomous driving.
Low-visibility conditions such as fog significantly impair vision-based pedestrian detection, posing safety challenges for autonomous driving, and surveillance. While electro-optical (Eo) cameras are highly susceptible to scattering, contrast loss, night-time glare, infrared (IR) imaging remains robust by preserving thermal signatures independent of illumination. This study provides a systematic comparison of EO and IR modalities for pedestrian detection under day and night fog conditions. An evaluation protocol is established to account for low-visibility and domain shifts, with analysis of modality-dpecific degradation effects. For IR, specialized detection strategies are investigated, including high-resolution (stride-4) detection heads, mulit-scale feature fusion, small-object reweighting (via hard-example mining), and an ILNet-style, background-suppression module to enhance thermal contrast. Benchmarking general-purpose and IR-specific detectors under consistent conditions, reveals key failure modes and robustness trends. Results show that IR-based approaches deliver more stable performance in fog, with tailored, detectors further improving sensitivity to pedestrians, particularly in severe night-time conditions. The findings provide practical guidance for sensor selection and detector design in foggy environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: