Key result
Cancer therapies, notably ICIs, ALK inhibitors, and 5-FU, are linked to significant bradyarrhythmias.
Why the study?
Bradyarrhythmias are an under-recognized cardiovascular toxicity of cancer therapy that can interrupt oncologic treatment as exposure to targeted and immune therapies increases.
What are the incidence, phenotype, mechanisms, and management of bradyarrhythmias associated with major anticancer drug classes?
What are the incidence, phenotype, mechanisms, and management of bradyarrhythmias associated with major anticancer drug classes?
Bradyarrhythmias are a heterogeneous but clinically consequential toxicity of various cancer therapies, requiring recognition of class-specific patterns and proactive management to maintain oncologic efficacy.
Alerts clinicians to bradyarrhythmia risks that may interrupt cancer therapy; leaves optimal management strategies open.
Background/Objectives: Bradyarrhythmias are an under-recognized component of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. As survivorship improves and exposure to targeted and immune therapies increases, clinicians increasingly face clinically relevant sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease that may interrupt otherwise effective oncologic treatment. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the incidence, phenotype, mechanisms, and management of bradyarrhythmias across major anticancer drug classes. Methods: We performed a narrative review of PubMed and major clinical guidelines, prioritizing prospective trials and large observational cohorts for incidence estimates, and case reports/series for phenotype and management details. Regulatory prescribing information and pharmacovigilance datasets were consulted to complement trial data. Evidence was organized by drug class and prototypical agents. Results: Bradyarrhythmias ranged from transient sinus bradycardia to high-grade atrioventricular block requiring pacing. The most severe phenotype was associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis, whereas ALK inhibitors, thalidomide, antimetabolites—particularly 5-fluorouracil—and taxanes showed more reproducible signals for sinus bradycardia. Bradyarrhythmic events were also described with proteasome inhibitors, BTK (Bruton tyrosine kinase) inhibitors, anthracyclines, platinum compounds, high-dose cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids, and other agents, but the strength of evidence varied from regulatory or cohort-based data to isolated case reports. Conclusions: Bradyarrhythmias during cancer therapy are heterogeneous but clinically consequential. Recognition of class-specific patterns, proactive ECG/electrolyte monitoring, and context-specific management (e.g., drug interruption/dose modification, pacing when indicated, risk-factor control) can minimize therapy interruption while maintaining oncologic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stępień et al. (2026) conducted a review in Bradyarrhythmias associated with oncologic treatment. Oncologic treatments was evaluated on Incidence, phenotype, mechanisms, and management of bradyarrhythmias. Oncologic treatments, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, ALK inhibitors, and 5-fluorouracil, are associated with heterogeneous but clinically consequential bradyarrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: