Why the study?
Long-term outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in neonates are suboptimal, and their predictors are not well acknowledged.
Does balloon aortic valvuloplasty provide adequate short- and long-term outcomes in neonates with congenital aortic stenosis?
Does balloon aortic valvuloplasty provide adequate short- and long-term outcomes in neonates with congenital aortic stenosis?
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in neonates provides satisfactory early results and good long-term survival, though aortic regurgitation is common and freedom from reintervention at 15 years is only 48%.
Introduction: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a common treatment method of aortic valve (AV) stenosis in neonates. Long-term BAV effects are suboptimal, and their predictors are not well acknowledged. Aim: To identify predictors of suboptimal short- and long-term BAV results. Material and methods: The study group comprised forty-three neonates (8 females; weight 3.34 ±0.56 kg) who underwent BAV between 1998 and 2021. Seventeen patients (39.53%) had critical AV stenosis. AV was bicuspid in 22 patients, tricuspid in 12, unicuspid in 2, and undefined in 7 patients. The mean balloon/annulus ratio was 0.9 ±0.07. Catheterization, clinical, and follow-up data were analysed. Results: The peak-to-peak gradient decreased from 67.5 ±26.3 to 21.3 ±12.6 mm Hg. Twenty-eight patients (65.1%) had adequate early outcome. Aortic regurgitation (AR) occurred in 13 (30.2%) patients. No predictors of inadequate early outcome were found. Twenty-year survival was 90.7%. Eleven (35.5%) patients underwent reintervention at a median of 12 (1-215) months; BAV in 5 patients, surgical valvuloplasty in 2, Ross operation in 2, AV replacement in 1, and Norwood operation in 1 patient. Fifteen-year freedom from reintervention (FFR) was 48%. Adequate early outcome resulted in higher FFR (71% vs. 22%), and so did no significant AR (60% vs. 30%). Conclusions: BAV provides satisfying early results. AR remains a significant aftermath of BAV. Risk factors and procedural techniques improving the outcome of BAV are unclear. Further research is needed to improve FFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyc et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: