Key result
PPGnet achieves ~3.4 BPM error in wrist PPG heart rate estimation without patient-specific training.
Why the study?
PPG-based heart rate measurement is susceptible to motion artifacts, and conventional learning-based methods rely on accelerometer data and do not address the need for device-specific modeling due to hardware differences.
Photoplethysmogram (PPG) is increasingly used to provide monitoring of the cardiovascular system under ambulatory conditions. Wearable devices like smartwatches use PPG to allow long-term unobtrusive monitoring of heart rate in free-living conditions. PPG based heart rate measurement is unfortunately highly susceptible to motion artifacts, particularly when measured from the wrist. Traditional machine learning and deep learning approaches rely on tri-axial accelerometer data along with PPG to perform heart rate estimation. The conventional learning based approaches have not addressed the need for device-specific modeling due to differences in hardware design among PPG devices. In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end deep learning model to perform heart rate estimation using 8-second length input PPG signal. We evaluate the proposed model on the IEEE SPC 2015 dataset, achieving a mean absolute error of 3.36±4.1BPM for HR estimation on 12 subjects without requiring patient-specific training. We also studied the feasibility of applying transfer learning along with sparse retraining from a comprehensive in-house PPG dataset for heart rate estimation across PPG devices with different hardware design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shyam et al. (2019) studied Heart rate estimation (n=72). PPGnet (Deep learning model) vs. State-of-the-art methods was evaluated on Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for heart rate estimation on IEEE SPC 2015 dataset. PPGnet achieved a mean absolute error of 3.36 ± 4.1 BPM for heart rate estimation on the IEEE SPC 2015 dataset using single-channel wrist PPG without patient-specific training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: