Why the study?
PPG provides non-invasive heart rate detection but fails to accurately capture true heartbeat waveform and phase due to inherent noise.
Does a deep learning fused multimodal wearable device improve heart rate monitoring accuracy compared to ECG in healthy participants?
Does a deep learning fused multimodal wearable device improve heart rate monitoring accuracy compared to ECG in healthy participants?
Fusing wearable pressure and PPG data with deep learning significantly improves heart rate monitoring accuracy across different physical activities.
May support multimodal wearables for activity-based HR monitoring; leaves open validation in patients and clinical settings.
Photoplethysmography (PPG) provides a non-invasive method to detect heart rate but, due to inherent noise, fails to accurately and reliably capture the true heartbeat waveform and phase needed by many cardiac activity monitoring applications such as measuring heart rate variability and blood pressure. In this work, we contribute 1) a multimodal heart rate and phase sensing device which is capable of capturing data from 17 channels including PPG, Accelerometer and Gyro at a high sampling rate of 500Hz, with a new pressure-sensing channel at 80Hz; and 2) a deep learning model to fuse multi-channel data to derive heart rate (HR) with high accuracy compared to ground truth from a reference electrocardiography (ECG) signal. We showed the sensors’, channels’ and locations’ contribution separately toward heart rate measurement and identified a preferred site for HR detection. We demonstrated the improved HR measurement on 21 healthy participants under three different activities, namely, stationary, walking and running. Our system achieved a stationary average absolute error (AAE) of 0.47bpm, 0.79bpm (walking) and 0.89bpm (running). The respective single heartbeat standard deviations were 28.43ms, 40.3ms and 34.14ms relative to an electrocardiography (ECG) detected R-peak. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to show that attachment pressure changes of a PPG sensor improved measurement accuracy by 8.0ms (25.6%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehrgardt et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: