Key result
Diastolic delta during TAVR best predicts relevant paravalvular regurgitation with an AUC of 0.82.
Why the study?
Paravalvular regurgitation is a common complication after TAVR associated with heart failure rehospitalization and mortality, prompting assessment of haemodynamic indices to predict relevant regurgitation.
Does diastolic delta measured during TAVR accurately predict relevant paravalvular regurgitation assessed by CMR?
Observational (n=77)
No
Does diastolic delta measured during TAVR accurately predict relevant paravalvular regurgitation assessed by CMR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diastolic delta measured during TAVR is the most accurate hemodynamic predictor of relevant paravalvular regurgitation, outperforming indices corrected for heart rate or systolic blood pressure.
AIMS: Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that poses an increased risk of rehospitalization for heart failure and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of haemodynamic indices to predict relevant PVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective single-centre clinical trial, four haemodynamic indices of PVR measured during TAVR were assessed for their correlation with gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived regurgitant fraction (CMR-RF) at 1 month follow-up: diastolic delta (DD), heart rate-adjusted diastolic delta (HR-DD), aortic regurgitation index (ARI), and aortic regurgitation index ratio (ARI ratio). These haemodynamic indices were analysed for their ability to predict relevant PVR (defined as CMR-RF > 20%) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with corresponding area under the ROC curves (AUCs). A total of 77 patients were included and had CMR performed 41 ± 14 days after TAVR. Mean CMR-RF was 12.4 ± 9.3%. Fifteen (19.5%) patients had CMR-RF > 20%. DD had the best correlation with CMR-RF and the highest AUC to predict relevant PVR (0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), followed by HR-DD (AUC 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89), ARI (AUC 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89), and ARI ratio (AUC 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81). The optimal cut-off value for DD was 32 mmHg, with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 77% in predicting relevant PVR. CONCLUSION: DD measured during TAVR best predicts relevant PVR. Correction for heart rate (HR-DD) or systolic blood pressure (ARI, ARI ratio) did not improve this predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rooijakkers et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=77). Diastolic delta (DD) vs. Heart rate-adjusted diastolic delta (HR-DD), aortic regurgitation index (ARI), and ARI ratio was evaluated on Prediction of relevant paravalvular regurgitation (CMR-RF > 20%) (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.92). Diastolic delta measured during TAVR best predicted relevant paravalvular regurgitation, and correction for heart rate or blood pressure did not improve prediction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: