Key result
Algorithm-derived DPTI ≤58 is linked to ~64% higher mortality and heart failure rehospitalization.
Why the study?
Detecting and grading paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR remains challenging.
Does algorithm-based invasive hemodynamic assessment of paravalvular regurgitation predict all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding devices?
Cohort (n=727)
No
Does algorithm-based invasive hemodynamic assessment of paravalvular regurgitation predict all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding devices?
Hazard Ratio: 1.64 (95% CI 1.14–2.37)
Algorithm-based invasive hemodynamic assessment of paravalvular regurgitation provides independent prognostic value for 3-year mortality and heart failure rehospitalization after TAVR, even in patients with angiographically mild regurgitation.
May refine post-TAVR risk stratification beyond angiography; leaves open whether DPTI thresholds should guide management.
Structured Abstract Background Detecting and grading of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) remains challenging. Aims We evaluated the prognostic value of algorithm-based invasively-measured hemodynamic indices of PVR for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalisations. Methods and Results We included 727 patients who underwent TAVR with a self-expanding valve for severe native aortic stenosis between 2015 and 2021 in the Radboudumc. Invasive left ventricular and aortic pressures were continuously measured, and were analysed offline using a validated algorithm for standardized computation of hemodynamic indices of PVR. The primary endpoint was an event-adjudicated composite of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalisation across three-year follow-up. Algorithm-derived diastolic pressure-time index (DPTI)≤58 and diastolic delta (DD)≤32mmHg were independently associated with the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 1.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 2.37], HR 1.80 [95%CI: 1.21, 2.68], respectively). Following stratification for angiography-graded PVR, algorithm-derived invasive indices remained independently associated with the composite outcome in those with angiographic mild-moderate (HR DPTI≤58mmHg: 2.94, 95%CI: 1.68, 5.15) but not none/trace PVR (HR DPTI≤58mmHg: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.49, 1.69). Inferences remained consistent when considering only those with angiographic mild PVR (HR DPTI≤58: 3.19, 95%CI: 1.62, 6.26). Conclusion Algorithm-based invasive assessment of PVR showed independent prognostic value for the risk of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalisation across three-year follow-up. Additionally, following stratification for angiography-graded PVR, hemodynamic indices remained independently associated with the composite outcome in those with angiographic mild PVR. Together, this highlights the potential of real-time automated assessment of invasive hemodynamics for risk stratification of patients undergoing TAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stens et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe native aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with a self-expanding valve (n=727). Algorithm-derived diastolic pressure-time index (DPTI) ≤58 vs. DPTI >58 was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalisation (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14, 2.37). Algorithm-derived diastolic pressure-time index (DPTI) ≤58 was independently associated with an increased risk of the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalisation (HR 1.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: