Why the study?
Prior research had not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery.
Does remote patient monitoring yield comparable outcomes to standard of care in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery?
Does remote patient monitoring yield comparable outcomes to standard of care in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery?
Remote patient monitoring using portable coagulometers and chatbots for post-cardiac surgery anticoagulation management is feasible and yields high patient and clinician satisfaction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RPM may enhance TTR in post-cardiac surgery anticoagulation; extends small pilot RCT but requires larger confirmatory trials.
Objective: Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol. Methods: to accurately measure International Normalized Ratio values and a mobile text-based chatbot to report PROs and adjust the therapeutic dosage. The study assessed patients' and clinicians' experience with RPM and compared direct costs. Results: Twenty-seven patients participated. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) levels during RPM were 72.2% and 50.6% for the SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively, and during SOC, they were 49.4% and 58.4% for SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively. Patients and the clinical team reported high trust and satisfaction with the proposed digital service. Statistically significant differences were only found in the cost of RPM in the RPM-SOC, which was higher than SOC in the SOC-RPM arm. Conclusions: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06423521.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guede-Fernández et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: