Why the study?
Accurate INR monitoring after LVAD implantation is vital to lower thrombosis or bleeding risks, but whether telemedical supervision improves time in therapeutic range compared with regular care remains unclear.
Does a telemedical anticoagulation service improve INR-specific time in the therapeutic range in LVAD patients compared to regular medical care with self-management?
Does a telemedical anticoagulation service improve INR-specific time in the therapeutic range in LVAD patients compared to regular medical care with self-management?
In LVAD patients, regular medical care with intensive self-management training achieved superior time in therapeutic range compared to a telemedical anticoagulation service.
Telemedicine anticoagulation may not improve TTR in LVAD patients; leaves open role of self-management versus remote services in larger trials.
Background The exact monitoring of the therapeutic-range international normalized ratio (INR) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is an important aim to reduce the risk of thrombosis or bleeding complications. Service providers offer a telemedical anticoagulation service (CS). Methods We compared LVAD patients using the CS (n = 15) to those who received regular medical care (RMC; n = 15) to investigate if telemedicine supervision increased the INR-specific time in the therapeutic range (TTR) during anticoagulation. All patients received self-management training for phenprocoumon medication according to their INR value. INR values were documented for 12 months. A survey (scale: 1 = not satisfied and 10 = very satisfied) was used to determine patient's satisfaction and psychological well-being. Results A total of 1,798 INR measurements were analyzed. The TTRRosendaal was higher in patients undergoing RMC (78.1 ± 14.3%) compared with that in patients using the CS (58.3 ± 28.0%, p = 0.03). The patient's satisfaction with the coagulation setting at the beginning of the study (RMC: 6.7 ± 3.1, CS: 7.2 ± 3.0, p = 0.74) and psychological wellbeing (RMC: 6.5 ± 1.9, CS: 6.5 ± 2.7, p = 0.97) were comparable between both groups. Conclusion We found that INR self-management is superior regarding the efficiency of post-LVAD anticoagulation therapy when compared with telemedical (CS)-based INR management in a small study cohort. Intensive training by experienced staff was able to replace CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogeler et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: