PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Energy Storage2 citations

Influence of Fin Orientation on the Solidification Performance of Bio‐Based Eutectic Phase Change Materials in a Triple‐Tube Thermal Energy Storage System

View Full Paper
USUtkarsh SrivastavaRSRashmi Rekha SahooPRPushpendra Kumar Singh Rathore

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how different fin orientations affect the solidification performance of bio-based phase change materials in thermal energy storage systems.
  • Conducted a computational analysis of solidification in a triple-tube thermal energy storage system.
  • Examined two fin configurations: longitudinal and radial.
  • Utilized a eutectic mixture of four bio-based phase change materials.
  • Longitudinal fins achieved complete solidification in 1645 seconds, 4% faster than radial fins.
  • Longitudinal configuration provided 35% higher energy discharge and 14.2% greater exergy output at St*Fo 0.01069.
  • Exergetic efficiency of longitudinal fins exceeded radial by 6.25% due to minimized thermal resistance.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research conducts a computational investigation of the solidification behavior of bio‐based eutectic phase change materials (bEPCMs) in a triple‐tube thermal energy storage (TTTES) system. The proposed configuration employs heat transfer fluid (HTF) flowing through the inner pipe and the outer annulus. In contrast, the intermediate annulus is filled with a eutectic mixture of four different bio‐based PCMs blended in equal proportions—chloroacetic acid–beeswax (97:3), magnesium chloride–manganese chloride (93:7), beeswax–manganese chloride (90:10), and cetyl alcohol–magnesium chloride (93:7). Two fin configurations—longitudinal and radial—are examined to assess their impact on solidification characteristics, energy discharge, and exergetic efficiency. Results reveal that fin geometry plays a crucial role in governing heat transfer and solidification behavior. Longitudinal fins demonstrate superior thermal performance, achieving complete solidification in 1645 s—approximately 4% faster than radial fins. At a St*Fo (product of Stefan and Fourier number) value of 0.01069, the longitudinal configuration exhibited nearly 35% higher energy discharge and 14.2% greater exergy output than the radial configuration. Furthermore, the exergetic efficiency of longitudinal fins exceeded that of radial fins by up to 6.25%, owing to enhanced conductive pathways, reduced thermal resistance, and minimized unused PCM regions. Contour analyses confirm that longitudinal fins promote more uniform and progressive solidification, while radial fins result in trapped liquid cores and uneven freezing fronts. Overall, this work demonstrates the combined potential of bio‐eutectic PCM mixtures and optimized fin geometries to enhance thermal and exergetic efficiency of TTTES systems, offering a viable pathway toward high‐efficiency, sustainable latent heat thermal energy storage technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srivastava et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a056767a550a87e60a1f695https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70420
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper