Cross-sectional study shows blenderized feeds reduce overlap in oropharyngeal and gastric microbiomes in children, suggesting better gut health.
BACKGROUND: Blenderized gastrostomy tube feeds are associated with reduced gastrointestinal symptoms. We hypothesize that patients receiving blenderized tube feeds, compared with standard formula, will have less gastric-oropharyngeal microbial overlap, a possible biomarker of less gastroesophageal refluxate, and differences in beta diversity in the oropharynx, stomach, and stool. METHODS: Children requiring enteral tube feeds for >3 months were prospectively recruited to provide saliva via posterior tongue swabs, gastric aspirates, and stool samples. Exclusion criteria were history of cystic fibrosis or solid organ transplant or antibiotic treatment course within 4 weeks. The primary exposure was diet category (formula vs. blenderized feeds). The primary outcome was Jaccard similarity between the gastric and oral microbiomes. Relationships of diet to Jaccard and relative bacterial abundance were analyzed by multivariate linear regression models adjusting for age, sex and proton pump inhibitor use. RESULTS: Sixty (60.6%) children received blenderized tube feeds and 39 (39.4%) received formula. Beta diversity in the oral and rectal samples differed significantly between patients on blenderized versus formula feeds. Importantly, gastric and tongue microbiomes had significantly less overlap (by Jaccard distance) in patients receiving blenderized feeds, adjusting for covariates. Several key oral, gastric and stool commensal organisms were present in higher relative abundance in the blenderized versus formula group. CONCLUSION: Oropharyngeal microbiomes are more distinct from the gastric microbiomes in patients receiving blenderized feeds, and the oropharyngeal and stool microbiomes demonstrated differential bacterial abundance compared with formula. Overall, these findings suggest a highly favorable microbial profile with blenderized feeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hron et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: