PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026European Journal of Preventive Cardiology2 citations

Joint association of sedentary behaviour and physical activity with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
FLFrances Rom M LunarKyoto UniversityZDZhen DuSouthern Medical UniversitySAShiho AmagasaTokyo Medical University

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze how physical activity and sedentary behavior together affect cardiovascular disease risk in adults.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane.
  • Examined studies published between January 2010 and February 2025 focused on the joint impact of physical activity and sedentary behavior.
  • Analyzed results from 17 studies to determine pooled effect sizes for different combinations of physical activity and sedentary behavior.
  • Lowest physical activity + highest sedentary behavior group shows an increased cardiovascular disease risk (pooled effect size 1.78, 95% CI: 1.59-2.00).
  • Lowest physical activity + lowest sedentary behavior group has a hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.12-1.40) for cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Highest physical activity + highest sedentary behavior group shows a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for cardiovascular disease risk.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies aimed to synthesize existing evidence on the joint association of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among adults. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for English studies published between January 2010 and February 2025 that examined the joint association of PA and SB (fatal and nonfatal) CVD among adults and pooled their results through meta-analyses using study-level data. Using findings from 17 studies, the pooled effect size for the lowest PA + highest SB group was 1.78 (95%CI: 1.59-2.00), suggesting increased risk for CVD compared to the reference group (i.e., highest PA + lowest SB). Compared to the same reference group, we found an increased risk for CVD in the lowest PA + lowest SB (HR=1.25, 95%CI: 1.12-1.40) and the highest PA + highest SB (HR=1.16, 95%CI: 1.06-1.27) groups. Subgroup analyses according to domains or types of PA and SB exposure, outcome measures, and exposure measurement method revealed a similar pattern. In conclusion, individuals with the lowest PA combined with the highest SB may experience an increased risk for CVD events compared to those with the highest PA and lowest SB. There was also an increased risk for individuals with a combination of either low PA + low SB and high PA + high SB, albeit to a lesser extent. Although substantial study-level heterogeneity exists, the results highlight the potential value of considering both behaviors jointly in relation to CVD risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lunar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05680ea550a87e60a20689https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag263
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper