PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Science Education1 citationsOpen Access

Students' Emotional Responses to Mistakes: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in University Chemistry Laboratory

View Full Paper
RKReetta KyynäräinenEVElisa VilhunenPLPei‐Hsin Li

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how undergraduate chemistry students emotionally respond to making mistakes in laboratory settings.
  • Utilized an ecological momentary assessment design to gather data from 240 students across 1635 learning situations.
  • Employed multilevel structural equation modeling to analyze the impact of situational and individual factors on emotional responses.
  • Examined the relationships between types of mistakes, forms of support, and students' emotional experiences.
  • Mistakes generally triggered negative activating emotions in students, with variations based on individual difference factors.
  • Careless mistakes led to more positive emotional responses, while mistakes due to skill or knowledge gaps increased anxiety and frustration levels.
  • Teacher support was associated with heightened anxiety and frustration, while peer support did not significantly affect emotional levels.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores students' emotions in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory, focusing particularly on emotional responses to making mistakes. Using an ecological momentary assessment design, we collected on‐task data from 240 students and 1635 learning situations during the laboratory sessions. A multilevel structural equation modeling framework, including a model with random slopes, was used to examine how situational factors (i.e., type of mistake and support in solving the mistake) and individual factor (i.e., gender, performance level, and subjective task values) affected students' emotional responses. Our findings suggest that mistakes typically trigger negative activating emotions in students. Individual factors also influenced emotional responses—well‐performing students were less prone to elevated anxiety and frustration, remaining more relaxed in mistake situations, whereas students with high perceived emotional costs of laboratory activities experienced a more intense increase in anxiety in mistake situations. The type of mistake played an important role: careless mistakes were associated with more positive emotions, whereas students experienced increased anxiety and frustration and decreased positive emotions when the mistake stemmed from skill or knowledge gaps. The form of support also mattered: teacher support was linked to intensified anxiety and frustration in students, while peer support showed no statistically significant impacts on emotional levels. To foster meaningful learning, targeted support in emotional regulation should be provided for lower‐performing students and those with high perceived emotional costs in mistake situations, particularly when mistakes stem from a lack of skill or knowledge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kyynäräinen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05680ea550a87e60a20710https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A glimpse of social presence during an organic chemistry group activity2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Can instructor feedback and failure dialogues reduce the stigma of failure and encourage help-seeking? An interdisciplinary undergraduate perspective2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3How making mistakes shapes students’ situational engagement in chemistry laboratory?2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4The Relevance of Situated Expectancy-Value Theory to Understanding Motivation and Emotion in Different Contexts2023 · 17 citations
  5. 5The Accuracy of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling With Pseudobalanced Groups and Small Samples2001 · 417 citations