Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Naturalistic observational study evaluates psychological interventions in primary care, indicating effective treatment for mental health.
OBJECTIVES: Common mental disorders (CMDs), including depression and anxiety, are highly prevalent in primary care, yet access to psychological therapies, which are the first-line treatment for these conditions, remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Clinical Psychology in Primary Care Programme in Cantabria during its first year of implementation, which integrated clinical psychologists into primary care teams to deliver brief, evidence-based interventions. DESIGN: Naturalistic observational pre-post study in primary care. METHODS: A total of 1149 patients (66% women; M = 44 years) were assessed with the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 before and after a brief psychological intervention of up to eight sessions per patient delivered individually or in groups. Linear mixed-effects models examined pre-post changes and moderators (intervention format, age, sex). Reliable change, deterioration and recovery were calculated. RESULTS: ≈ 1.3); 73% achieved reliable improvement and 51% met reliable recovery criteria, while deterioration rates were below 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the consolidation and expansion of the integration of clinical psychologists into primary care, providing evidence that the psychological interventions delivered in this context are a feasible, equitable and effective approach to treating CMDs in the Spanish public health system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González‐Blanch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: