Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of thoracoscopic ablation of persistent and long-standing AF in the long-term follow-up period.
Does thoracoscopic ablation effectively prevent atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation?
Does thoracoscopic ablation effectively prevent atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation?
Thoracoscopic ablation with left atrial appendage exclusion is an effective long-term treatment for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with significantly higher success rates in persistent compared to long-standing cases.
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of thoracoscopic ablation (TSA) of persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation (AF) in the long-term follow-up period. Methods. TSA of AF with unilateral left atrial appendage exclusion was performed in 50 patients with persistent (group I) and 50 patients with long-onset AF (group II). Efficacy was defined as the absence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or supraventricular tachycardia) lasting more than 30 seconds recorded on Holter ECG monitoring at study controls. Results. TSA was 78% effective in group I and 63% effective in group II over the three-year follow-up period (p=0,037). Catheter ablations 3 months after TSA were required in 8 (16%) patients in group I and 9 (18%) in group II (p>0,05), of which two patients had typical atrial flutter on ECG, which required radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. The efficacy of staged treatment of AF at 3 months after additional catheter ablation was 100% and 88,2% after 6 months. Conclusion. Video-assisted thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation should be considered a promising approach for the management of persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ревишвили et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: