Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts compared to cardiac catheterization in patients with prior bypass surgery?
Observational (n=20)
Blinded to reference standard
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts compared to cardiac catheterization in patients with prior bypass surgery?
This study describes a protocol for using MR imaging to evaluate aortocoronary bypass graft patency, though results are truncated.
Truncated report describes MRI protocol for graft patency; leaves open accuracy versus catheterization in post-bypass patients.
To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating graft patency after coronary bypass surgery, 20 patients who had prior surgery (average 5.5 years, range 1.5 to 14) and recent cardiac catheterization because of chest pain were studied. No patient had surgical intervention or change in symptoms in the time interval between catheterization and MR imaging. These 20 patients had a total of 47 grafts, defined as proximal anastomoses: 20 to the left anterior descending or diagonal artery (LAD), 13 to the left circumflex artery marginal branches (LCX), and 14 to the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery (RCA). The patients underwent cardiac and respiratory gated MR scans in a 0.5 tesla magnet with an echo time of 22 msec and two repetitions in a 128 X 256 matrix. In-plane resolution was 2.7 mm. Every patient had a scan in the transaxial plane and some underwent scanning in the sagittal and coronal planes as well. A graft was considered patent by MR when a signal-free lumen was visualized in an anatomic position consistent with that of a bypass graft, had a lumen larger than the native vessels, was seen on more than one slice, and was seen at a level higher than that of the native vessels. If a known graft was not seen it was considered occluded. The scans were interpreted by consensus of two physicians aware of the operative but not the cardiac catheterization data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubinstein et al. (1987) conducted an observational in Prior coronary bypass surgery with chest pain (n=20). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Graft patency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: