Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an overall predictive accuracy of 78% for determining coronary artery bypass graft patency and occlusion compared to coronary angiography.
Why the study?
Does multiphasic electrocardiographically gated MR imaging accurately determine coronary artery bypass graft patency compared to coronary angiography in symptomatic patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=25)
Blinded
Does multiphasic electrocardiographically gated MR imaging accurately determine coronary artery bypass graft patency compared to coronary angiography in symptomatic patients?
Multiphasic electrocardiographically gated MR imaging provides a noninvasive and reasonably accurate method for evaluating coronary artery bypass graft patency.
Supports noninvasive MR assessment of CABG patency; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A noninvasive means of determining coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency in symptomatic patients would be an important clinical asset. The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated for this purpose. Multiphasic electrocardiographically gated MR imaging examinations were performed in 25 patients with a total of 72 grafts. Transverse images of the heart at ten anatomic levels were obtained at five or six phases of the cardiac cycle. The MR images were read blindly to determine CABG patency versus occlusion, and these results were compared with those of coronary angiography performed within 2 months before the MR imaging. MR imaging correctly disclosed 43 patent grafts and 13 occluded grafts (predictive accuracy, 78%). Patency and occlusion were incorrectly diagnosed from MR imaging findings in five and four CABGs, respectively. CABG status could not be determined in seven (10%) grafts because the grafts were visualized at only one anatomic level. Thus, the accuracy of a definitive MR imaging evaluation was 91% (43 of 47 grafts) for patency determination and 72% (13 of 18 grafts) for occlusion determination. MR imaging appears to be a useful method for the noninvasive evaluation of CABGs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1987) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery bypass graft patency (n=25). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Predictive accuracy for CABG patency versus occlusion. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an overall predictive accuracy of 78% for determining coronary artery bypass graft patency and occlusion compared to coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: