Why the study?
Does combined MR angiography and flow measurement accurately detect graft stenosis in symptomatic patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts compared to conventional angiography or MDCT?
Does combined MR angiography and flow measurement accurately detect graft stenosis in symptomatic patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts compared to conventional angiography or MDCT?
Combined MR angiography and flow measurement is highly accurate for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency and stenosis in symptomatic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive MR graft assessment in symptomatic post-CABG patients; leaves open prospective validation versus angiography.
This study evaluated graft patency and flow at rest/stress in patients with coronary artery bypass grafts using MR flow measurements and MR angiography (MRA). 45 symptomatic patients with 86 grafts (46 arterial, 40 venous) were examined 5.5 years after surgery. MRA was used to assess bypass patency. Flow measurements were performed at rest and after stress induction with dipyridamole. All graft segments were evaluated at MRA for stenosis, and were additionally evaluated by the combination of flow measurements and MRA. Conventional coronary angiography or multidetector computed tomography was regarded as a reference standard. No significant stenosis was observed in 49 grafts (Group A), whereas significant stenosis was observed in 37 grafts (Group B). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis in arterial grafts were 95.2%, 96.8%, 80% and 99.4%, respectively, and in venous grafts were 100%, 97.8%, 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The mean blood flow rate at baseline/stress in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (p<0.002/p<0.001). With the combined MR method, 84 of 86 (97%) grafts could be correctly classified. In conclusion, MRI allows a combined assessment of graft status, including bypass patency and flow, in symptomatic patients after revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stauder et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: