Why the study?
In atrial fibrillation, surgical management of the left atrial appendage is crucial to prevent stroke, but incomplete closure poses a residual embolic risk.
Even with direct visualization via robotic surgery, incomplete endocardial continuous suture LAA closure occurs in nearly one-quarter of patients, suggesting alternative occlusion techniques may be needed in higher-risk patients with structural remodeling.
Incomplete LAA closure in 24% of robotic cases should not yet change practice; leaves open optimal technique and stroke risk in larger trials.
OBJECTIVES: In atrial fibrillation (AF), surgical management of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is crucial to prevent stroke. However, incomplete closure poses a residual embolic risk. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent LAA closure using a continuous polypropylene suture technique during mitral valve surgery with the da Vinci system. Closure completeness was assessed via electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography (CT), and 3 D imaging was used to localize incomplete sites. RESULTS: Of 125 patients, 100 underwent postoperative CT. Complete closure (cLAA) was achieved in 76%, while 24% had incomplete closure (iLAA), typically at the mitral valve junction or suture start. These showed a characteristic "speech bubble" appearance. iLAA was associated with tricuspid valve repair and low V1 f-wave amplitude. Stroke rates were similar between groups over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete LAA closure occurred in 24% of cases despite direct visualization using robotics. Anatomical factors likely contribute more than technique alone. For high-risk patients with long-standing AF, techniques such as lumen crushing or external clips may enhance closure success. Further refinements are needed to improve the reliability of internal LAA closure methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: