Why the study?
The study evaluated the effects of empagliflozin compared with glimepiride on the myocardial glucose metabolic rate in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Does empagliflozin reduce myocardial glucose metabolic rate compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes without coronary artery disease?
Does empagliflozin reduce myocardial glucose metabolic rate compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes without coronary artery disease?
Empagliflozin significantly reduces myocardial glucose metabolic rate and improves cardiac geometry, function, and energetics compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Empagliflozin may confer cardiac metabolic advantages over glimepiride in T2D; extends RCT evidence to direct myocardial glucose PET measures.
AIM: F-FDG-PET) combined with euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: F-FDG-PET combined with euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp in 23 patients with type 2 diabetes. We also measured cardiac geometry and myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency, as well as systolic and diastolic function by echocardiography. RESULTS: Compared with glimepiride, treatment with empagliflozin resulted in a greater reduction in the myocardial glucose metabolic rate from baseline to 26 weeks (adjusted difference -6.07 [-8.59, -3.55] μmol/min/100 g; P < .0001). Moreover, compared with glimepiride, empagliflozin led to significant reductions in left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide levels, blood pressure, heart rate, stroke work, and myocardial oxygen consumption estimated by the rate pressure product, and increases in ejection fraction, myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency, red blood cells, and haematocrit and haemoglobin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence that empagliflozin treatment in subjects with type 2 diabetes without coronary artery disease leads to a significant reduction in the myocardial glucose metabolic rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Succurro et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: