Key result
Invasive provocation testing for coronary artery vasospasm reveals significant heterogeneity in dosing and procedural approach.
Why the study?
Current invasive coronary provocation testing protocols vary in dosage, administration time, and approach, while specificity concerns and potential complications limit routine clinical uptake.
What is the current state of diagnostic protocols for invasive provocation testing in the evaluation of coronary artery vasospasm?
Systematic Review
What is the current state of diagnostic protocols for invasive provocation testing in the evaluation of coronary artery vasospasm?
Current protocols for invasive provocation testing of coronary artery vasospasm are highly heterogeneous, suggesting a need for standardization to encourage routine clinical uptake.
May limit routine clinical adoption of provocation testing; extends calls for standardized diagnostic protocols.
Coronary provocation testing is an essential diagnostic procedure when evaluating vasospastic angina. Invasive methods using acetylcholine or ergonovine are considered the current gold standard. Despite efforts from global cardiovascular institutions, current protocols vary in dosage, administration time, and procedural approach. In addition, concerns over the specificity of findings and potential complications have limited routine uptake of this procedure in clinical practice. This systematic review evaluates current diagnostic protocols, focusing on invasive provocation testing. We included studies using intracoronary provocation testing with acetylcholine or ergonovine for the assessment of coronary artery vasospasm that detailed specific elements of the procedure (dosage, administration time, etc.) and included ≥50 patients. A total of 28 articles met strict inclusion criteria. Our review highlights the heterogeneity between current diagnostic protocols for invasive provocation testing. We believe standardization of a diagnostic protocol will encourage both current and future cardiologists to incorporate such procedures in the evaluation of variant angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehan et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Coronary artery vasospasm. Invasive provocation testing with acetylcholine or ergonovine was evaluated. A systematic review of 28 articles evaluating invasive provocation testing for coronary artery vasospasm revealed significant heterogeneity in dosage, administration time, and procedural approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: