Key result
Valve-in-valve-in-valve TAVI resolves high-risk bioprosthetic restenosis, cutting the transvalvular gradient by ~75% and improving symptoms.
Why the study?
Does a third valve-in-valve-in-valve (ViViV) TAVI improve hemodynamics and symptoms in a high-risk patient with severe bioprosthetic valve restenosis?
Case Report (n=1)
Does a third valve-in-valve-in-valve (ViViV) TAVI improve hemodynamics and symptoms in a high-risk patient with severe bioprosthetic valve restenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A third valve-in-valve-in-valve TAVI is feasible and provides significant hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement for high-risk patients with recurrent bioprosthetic valve restenosis.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has significantly improved in treating aortic valve disease in recent years, particularly in patients at high surgical risk. This case report describes an 80-year-old woman who had severe aortic stenosis previously treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and six years later had a valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI who developed severe symptomatic restenosis of the bioprosthetic aortic valve five years later of the last procedure. A third valve-in-valve-in-valve (ViViV) TAVI using a 26-mm Sapien 3 valve was performed due to the high surgical risk. The procedure resulted in significant hemodynamic improvement, reducing the transvalvular gradient from 80-90 mmHg to 15-20 mmHg and increasing the effective orifice area from 0.4 cm² to 1.5 cm². The patient's symptoms improved to NYHA Class I. This case highlights the feasibility and safety of ViViV TAVI as a minimally invasive solution for recurrent bioprosthetic valve dysfunction in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burgos et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Severe bioprosthetic valve restenosis (n=1). Valve-in-valve-in-valve (ViViV) TAVI was evaluated on Hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement. Valve-in-valve-in-valve TAVI successfully reduced the transvalvular gradient from 80-90 to 15-20 mmHg and improved symptoms to NYHA Class I in a high-risk patient with bioprosthetic restenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: