Key result
Valve-in-valve TAVI achieves clinical recovery in a failed bioprosthesis with residual chronic type A dissection.
Why the study?
ViV TAVI in patients with prior surgical bioprostheses presents significant challenges, particularly with stentless valves or radiolucent posts, requiring adequate pre-procedural planning.
Case Report (n=1)
ViV TAVI can be successfully performed in complex patients with failed bioprostheses and residual type A aortic dissection with careful pre-procedural planning.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable treatment of choice in patients with severe aortic stenosis across a wide spectrum of surgical risks (inoperable-high-moderate-low risk). Valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI has emerged as a valid treatment option in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves, especially in those with intermediate, high or prohibitive risk of surgery.ViV TAVI in patients with prior surgical bioprosthesis presents significant challenges, particularly in cases with stentless valves or radiolucent posts. Therefore, adequate pre-procedural planning is of utmost importance to its success. However, our case had multiple challenges that had to be overcome, including radiolucent posts, residual chronic type A aortic dissection flap in the non-coronary cusp and large body habitus with Killip class IV. Having successfully navigated the above challenges, we report this interesting and complex case of ViV TAVI which was a procedural success associated with significant improvement and recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olusan et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Failed aortic bioprosthetic valve with residual chronic type A aortic dissection (n=1). Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV TAVI) was evaluated on Procedural success and clinical recovery. Valve-in-valve TAVI was successfully performed in a complex patient with a failed bioprosthesis, radiolucent posts, and residual chronic type A aortic dissection, resulting in clinical recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: