Key result
Greater blood pressure variability linked to ~7% higher albuminuria, but not other MVD measures.
Why the study?
Determinants of microvascular dysfunction are incompletely understood, and greater blood pressure variability may be one such determinant.
Is greater blood pressure variability associated with microvascular dysfunction?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,773)
Is greater blood pressure variability associated with microvascular dysfunction?
Effect estimate: Ratio 1.04 (systolic) and 1.07 (diastolic) (95% CI 1.00-1.08 (systolic) and 1.03-1.11 (diastolic))
Greater systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability is associated with higher albuminuria, suggesting the renal microvasculature is particularly vulnerable to BPV.
BPV was associated with albuminuria but not other MVD; hypothesis-generating for renal vulnerability, requiring prospective confirmation before practice implications.
BACKGROUND: Microvascular dysfunction (MVD) contributes to stroke, dementia, depression, retinopathy and chronic kidney disease. However, the determinants of MVD are incompletely understood. Greater blood pressure variability (BPV) may be one such determinant. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used cross-sectional data of The Maastricht Study (n = 2773, age 59.9 years; 51.9% men) to investigate whether greater very short- to mid-term BPV is associated with various MVD measures. We standardized and averaged within-visit, 24-h and 7-day BPV into a systolic and a diastolic BPV composite score. MVD measures included a composite score of MRI cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) features (total brain parenchymal volume, white matter hyperintensity volume, lacunar infarcts and cerebral microbleeds), a composite score of flicker light-induced retinal arteriolar and venular dilation response, albuminuria, heat-induced skin hyperemia and a composite score of plasma biomarkers of MVD (sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, sE-selectin and von Willebrand Factor). We used linear regression adjusted for age, sex, glucose metabolism status, mean 24-h systolic or DBP, cardiovascular risk factors and antihypertensive medication. We found that higher systolic and diastolic BPV composite scores (per SD) were associated with higher albuminuria [higher ratio, 1.04 (95% CI 1.00-1.08) and 1.07 (1.03-1.11), respectively], but not with other measures of MVD tested. CONCLUSION: Greater systolic and diastolic BPV was associated with higher albuminuria, but not with CSVD features, flicker light-induced retinal arteriolar and venular dilation response, heat-induced skin hyperemia and plasma biomarkers of MVD. This suggests that the microvasculature of the kidneys is most vulnerable to the detrimental effects of greater BPV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Microvascular dysfunction (n=2,773). Blood pressure variability was evaluated on Microvascular dysfunction measures (CSVD, retinal dilation, albuminuria, skin hyperemia, plasma biomarkers) (Ratio 1.04 (systolic) and 1.07 (diastolic), 95% CI 1.00-1.08 (systolic) and 1.03-1.11 (diastolic)). Greater systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability was associated with higher albuminuria (ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08 and 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11), but not with other measures of MVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: